Skip to content
Health in Plain

BMR During Pregnancy — Baseline and Extra Calories

Every common basal metabolic rate formula — Mifflin-St Jeor included — was fitted on non-pregnant adults. Used during pregnancy it gives you a baseline, not a requirement. Start with that baseline, ideally from your pre-pregnancy weight:

Your basal metabolic rate (Mifflin-St Jeor)

1,618kcal/day

This is the energy your body burns at complete rest, just to stay alive.

How we got this number

For a 30-year-old woman at a pre-pregnancy 140 lb and 5 ft 5 in (63.5 kg, 165.1 cm), that is 635 + 1,031 − 150 − 161 = 1,355 kcal/day at rest.

Why a standard formula cannot answer this

The equation has four inputs, and none of them is gestational week. It has no way to represent the placenta, the growing fetus, expanded blood volume, or the maternal tissue laid down along the way. It describes the body you had before.

The current US reference — the 2023 Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy — handles pregnancy differently, in two pieces:

  1. A total expenditure prediction equation that takes age, height, current weight, gestational week and physical activity level. The gestational week input is the part no BMR calculator has.
  2. An energy deposition term added on top, covering the energy stored in maternal and fetal tissue.

The estimated requirement is the sum of the two.

The trimester numbers, updated

This is where the widely repeated figures are out of date. The older reference used a flat addition — roughly +340 kcal/day in the second trimester and +452 in the third — regardless of who was pregnant. The 2023 report replaced that with deposition that depends on pre-pregnancy BMI:

Pre-pregnancy BMI categoryEnergy deposition, 2nd and 3rd trimesters
Underweightabout +300 kcal/day
Healthy weightabout +200 kcal/day
Overweightabout +150 kcal/day
Obesityabout −50 kcal/day

Two things stand out. The healthy-weight figure of roughly 200 kcal is meaningfully lower than the 340 people still quote — a glass of milk and a banana, not a second dinner. And the obesity row is negative: the framework anticipates mobilizing existing stores rather than depositing new ones, which is a clinical judgment and precisely the sort of thing that belongs with a prenatal team rather than a calculator.

For the first trimester there is no addition at all. The report is explicit that first-trimester needs are estimated from the non-pregnant equations, “because weight gain is minor and variable in the first trimester.” If you do not know which BMI band applies to you, the pregnancy BMI calculator works from pre-pregnancy weight.

”Eating for two” was never the reading

Put the deposition next to a real day. A healthy-weight woman with a 1,355 kcal baseline and a moderately active life is already somewhere near 2,100 kcal for total daily expenditure. The second-trimester addition of about 200 kcal is roughly a 10% increase — noticeable, but nowhere near a doubling.

There is a deeper point underneath. Doubly labeled water measurements across ages 8 days to 95 years found that expenditure adjusted for fat-free mass remains stable in adulthood from 20 to 60 years, even during pregnancy. Pregnancy adds tissue, and more tissue costs more to run — but it does not shift the body into a different metabolic gear. That is a useful expectation to hold, because it means the extra requirement scales with the pregnancy rather than arriving all at once.

What this page is not

It is not a substitute for prenatal care, and it should not be used to restrict intake. Gestational weight gain is tracked against pre-pregnancy BMI by the people managing your pregnancy, adjusted to how an individual pregnancy is going, and no static table replaces that. If your appetite, weight trajectory or energy levels are worrying you, that is a prenatal appointment, not a recalculation.

For the general explanation of the equation the baseline comes from, see the BMR calculator; for the non-pregnant female version with the cycle and breastfeeding questions, the BMR calculator for women; and for what does and does not raise daily burn generally, how to speed up metabolism.

This content is informational and does not replace prenatal medical care.

Frequently asked questions

What does BMR stand for in pregnancy?

Basal metabolic rate — the energy your body uses at complete rest. The abbreviation means the same thing in pregnancy as anywhere else; what changes is that a standard formula no longer describes the whole requirement.

How many extra calories are needed in the first trimester?

None, in the reference framework. The 2023 Dietary Reference Intakes estimate first-trimester needs from the non-pregnant equations, because weight gain in those weeks is minor and variable, so no allowance is made for energy deposition.

Is the extra amount still 340 and 452 calories?

Not in the current reference. The 2023 report replaced a single flat addition with energy deposition that depends on pre-pregnancy BMI: about 300 kcal/day if underweight, 200 if healthy weight, 150 if overweight, and about −50 with obesity.

Can I use a normal BMR calculator while pregnant?

It gives your non-pregnant baseline, which is a legitimate starting point but is not your requirement. The current reference builds the pregnancy figure from an equation that includes gestational week, then adds deposition on top.

Does pregnancy make metabolism faster?

Total expenditure rises because there is more tissue to run. Per unit of fat-free mass, though, expenditure has been measured as stable through adulthood from 20 to 60 years, pregnancy included — so it is scale, not a different metabolic gear.

Sources

  1. Development of Prediction Equations for Estimated Energy Requirements — Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2023
  2. Pontzer H et al. Daily energy expenditure through the human life course. Science, 2021;373(6556):808-812
  3. Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA, Koh YO. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr, 1990;51(2):241-7

Written by Lucas Silva · Reviewed by Lucas Silva · Updated on August 13, 2026