Conicity Index Calculator (C Index)
The conicity index scores how far your torso has drifted from a cylinder toward a double cone. It needs three inputs — waist, weight and height — and no hip measurement, which is what separates it from every other shape ratio. Enter your numbers below.
Conicity index
1.20
Low risk.
How we got this number
How the geometry works
Ronald Valdez proposed the index in 1991 on a simple premise: for a given weight and height, assuming a constant body density, there is an expected waist. Compare the real waist to the expected one and you have a dimensionless score.
C index = waist in meters ÷ (0.109 × √(weight in kg ÷ height in m))
Someone with almost no abdominal accumulation approaches a cylinder and scores near 1. As fat concentrates at the middle while the limbs stay narrow, the silhouette becomes two cones joined at the waist and the score rises. A 200 lb, 5 ft 10 in adult (91 kg, 1.78 m) with a 38 in (97 cm) waist scores about 1.25.
What the thresholds are worth
This is the part most calculators skip. The values you will see quoted — 1.25 for men and 1.18 for women — were proposed by Pitanga and colleagues and were derived in Brazilian populations. They are reproduced widely in the literature, including in the Einstein São Paulo study cited below, but no United States agency has adopted a conicity cut-off, and the index has not been calibrated on a US sample.
Read your score accordingly: as a position on a continuum, not as a pass or fail. A number that moves from 1.30 to 1.22 over a year of changed habits tells you something real. A number sitting at 1.19 tells you very little about whether you personally are at risk.
| C index | How to read it |
|---|---|
| Below about 1.2 | Waist close to the cylinder predicted by your size |
| About 1.2 to 1.3 | Measurable central accumulation |
| Above about 1.3 | Pronounced double-cone shape |
What has a US number behind it
If you want an abdominal measurement with an American threshold attached, use the raw waist. The NHLBI flags more than 40 inches (102 cm) in men and more than 35 inches (89 cm) in women as raising the risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes — a single measurement, no arithmetic, and a cut-off issued by a US institute.
The WHO route is the waist-to-hip ratio, at 0.90 for men and 0.85 for women, which describes distribution rather than amount. And if what you want is the share of your body that is fat rather than the shape it makes, that is a different measurement entirely — start at the body fat percentage calculator.
Every one of these is a screen. A high value is a reason to have a conversation with a clinician, not a diagnosis by itself.
Frequently asked questions
What is the conicity index actually comparing?
Your real waist against the waist a cylinder of your weight and height would have. The further above 1 the score climbs, the more your torso departs from that cylinder toward a double cone, which is the geometry of central fat.
What is the formula for the C index?
Waist in meters divided by 0.109 times the square root of weight in kilograms over height in meters. The 0.109 is a constant derived from average body density in the original 1991 derivation by Valdez.
Is there an American cut-off for this index?
Not one issued by a US agency. The commonly used thresholds of 1.25 for men and 1.18 for women were derived in Brazilian cohorts by Pitanga and colleagues, and they have not been validated as a screening rule for the US population.
Why would I use this instead of a hip measurement?
Because it does not need one. That makes the index usable when a hip measurement is impractical or unreliable, and it lets you compare people of very different sizes on a common scale without a second circumference.
Sources
- Cardiovascular risk and use of conicity index in patients submitted to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Einstein (São Paulo) 2018
- Optimal cutoff of the waist-to-hip ratio for detecting cardiovascular risk factors. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2014
- Assessing Your Risk — National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Written by Lucas Silva · Reviewed by Lucas Silva · Updated on August 13, 2026