Skip to content
Health in Plain

Half Marathon Time From 10K

A 10K result is the best single predictor of a half marathon that most runners have lying around: the two races are close enough in duration that Riegel’s exponent barely has to reach. Enter your 10K time and read off the half:

Race result you already have

Distance to predict

Predicted time

52:07

Predicted pace of 5:13/km.

How we got this number

T₂ = T₁ × (D₂ ÷ D₁)^1.06 = 25:00 × (10 ÷ 5)^1.06 = 52:07

Worked example: 50:00 for 10K

T₂ = 50:00 × (21.0975 ÷ 10)^1.06 = 1:50:19, a pace of 5:14/km (8:25/mile).

10K resultPredicted halfPredicted half pace
45:001:39:174:42/km
50:001:50:195:14/km
55:002:01:215:45/km

The multiplier is always the same — 2.2064 — because the half marathon is always 2.1 times a 10K and the exponent never changes. What changes is what that costs you in seconds per kilometer.

The variable the formula is blind to

Riegel’s equation sees two distances and one time. It does not know whether you have run past 90 minutes since your last 10K. That matters more here than it did stepping up from the 5K, because the half marathon is the first common race distance where carbohydrate availability and simple time on your feet start to shape the last few kilometers.

The good news is that the arithmetic itself holds up at this range. When 2,303 recreational runners were checked against the formula, half marathon predictions came out statistically well calibrated — the same test failed badly one distance further up. So if your race comes in slower than the prediction, the likely culprit is your long-run volume, not the math.

Building the plan around the number

Use the predicted pace as the target for the middle of the race, not the opening kilometer. A practical sequence: run the first 5K about five seconds per kilometer slower than the predicted pace, settle onto it through 15K, and spend whatever is left in the final 6K. Runners who go out at goal pace from the gun almost always finish behind their prediction.

When the half is done, that result becomes the new starting point — see the marathon prediction from a half marathon, and read how accurate the formula really is before you trust the marathon line.

Frequently asked questions

What half marathon time does a 50-minute 10K predict?

About 1:50:19, a pace of 5:14/km or 8:25/mile. The 10K was run at 5:00/km, so the formula asks you to give back roughly fourteen seconds per kilometer over the longer race.

Is a 10K a good enough basis for a half marathon prediction?

Yes, and the evidence backs it. In a study of 2,303 recreational runners, half marathon times predicted by the Riegel formula showed no sign of miscalibration, unlike marathon predictions from the same equation.

Does the prediction account for my long runs?

It cannot. The formula only sees two distances and one time. If your longest run is well under 90 minutes, treat the predicted half time as aspirational rather than as a pace to lock into on race morning.

How do I turn the predicted time into a race pace?

Divide the predicted time by 21.0975 km. For 1:50:19 that gives 5:14/km. Run the first 5K a few seconds slower than that number and let the pace come to you, rather than banking time early.

Should I predict the half from my 10K or from my 5K?

From the 10K. The closer the two distances, the less the formula has to extrapolate — a 10K is 2.1 times the half, while a 5K is 4.2 times it and roughly doubles the room for error.

Sources

  1. Vickers AJ, Vertosick EA. An empirical study of race times in recreational endurance runners. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil, 2016;8:26

Written by Lucas Silva · Reviewed by Lucas Silva · Updated on August 15, 2026